august.
mon 3 (cont) fri 7 .
public hearing: case study 29 into jehovah's witnesses, sydney.
So, no matter what black and white printed evidence says, he denies it. What a "loving shepherd"...
Black and white... he can read it, but he just says "my memory". It is not a matter of memory anymore, it exists for him to read. He does NOT have to remember.
august.
mon 3 (cont) fri 7 .
public hearing: case study 29 into jehovah's witnesses, sydney.
august.
mon 3 (cont) fri 7 .
public hearing: case study 29 into jehovah's witnesses, sydney.
Here is the "formal" letter of DFing.. July12, 1989... Mr Eli's notes are dated 7/12/89... same date I mentioned earlier.
He is caught in a lie....
august.
mon 3 (cont) fri 7 .
public hearing: case study 29 into jehovah's witnesses, sydney.
He says, "We did not know of that information"
How does HE know?
He CAN'T remember, right?
august.
mon 3 (cont) fri 7 .
public hearing: case study 29 into jehovah's witnesses, sydney.
How would you like to entrust YOUR life into this scumbags hands? No integrity whatsoever, none!
"We hate child abuse!" Liars!
august.
mon 3 (cont) fri 7 .
public hearing: case study 29 into jehovah's witnesses, sydney.
august.
mon 3 (cont) fri 7 .
public hearing: case study 29 into jehovah's witnesses, sydney.
So, he sees the testimony of "Eli", & I guess he wasn't toooooo worried about his testimony being messed up, so that he could be "objective"... was he?
august.
mon 3 (cont) fri 7 .
public hearing: case study 29 into jehovah's witnesses, sydney.
august.
mon 3 (cont) fri 7 .
public hearing: case study 29 into jehovah's witnesses, sydney.
"The other principle that would apply is confidentiality"....
Well, if you were sickened... why did you not encourage her, and take those actions then? (as in helping her out by going to court with her, as you did later)
august.
mon 3 (cont) fri 7 .
public hearing: case study 29 into jehovah's witnesses, sydney.
"We are following well established principles, having two witnesses" he thinks he sounds so righteous, royal, elevated.
Do you appreciate that the Civil Courts CAN act on just one witness?
"I don't believe that's correct, your Honor"
